Zenos Paradoxes: A Timely Solution
نویسنده
چکیده
Zeno of Eleas motion and infinity paradoxes, excluding the Stadium, are stated (1), commented on (2), and their historical proposed solutions then discussed (3). Their correct solution, based on recent conclusions in physics associated with time and classical and quantum mechanics, and in particular, of there being a necessary trade off of all precisely determined physical values at a time (including relative position), for their continuity through time, is then explained (4). This article follows on from another, more physics orientated and widely encompassing paper entitled Time and Classical and Quantum Mechanics: Indeterminacy vs. Discontinuity (Lynds, 2003), with its intention being to detail the correct solution to Zenos paradoxes more fully by presently focusing on them alone. If any difficulties are encountered in understanding any aspects of the physics underpinning the following contents, it is suggested that readers refer to the original paper for a more in depth coverage.
منابع مشابه
Inclosures, Vagueness, and Self-Reference
In this paper, I start by showing that sorites paradoxes are inclosure paradoxes. That is, they fit the Inclosure Scheme which characterizes the paradoxes of self-reference. Given that sorites and self-referential paradoxes are of the same kind, they should have the same kind of solution. The rest of the paper investigates what a dialetheic solution to sorites paradoxes is like, connections wit...
متن کاملA Kripkean Solution to Paradoxes of Denotation
Kripke’s solution to the Liar Paradox and other paradoxes of truth (1975) is generalized to the paradoxes of denotation. Berry’s Paradox and Hilbert and Bernays’ Paradox are treated in detail.
متن کاملThe Principle of Uniform Solution ( of the Paradoxes of Self - Reference ) NICHOLAS
Graham Priest (1994) has argued that the following paradoxes all have the same structure: Chain Paradoxes, and the Heterological Paradox. Their common structure is given by Russell's Schema: there is a property φ and function δ such that (1) w = {x| φ(x)} exists, and (2) if y is a subset of w, then (i) δ(y) ∉ y, and (ii) δ(y) ∈ w. Thus, for example, in the case of Burali-Forti's Paradox, φ(x) i...
متن کاملThe Principle of Uniform Solution (of the Paradoxes of Self-Reference)
Schema: there is a property φ and function δ such that (1) w = {x|φ(x)} exists, and (2) if y is a subset of w, then (i) δ(y) ∉ y, and (ii) δ(y) ∈ w. Thus, for example, in the case of Burali-Forti's Paradox, φ(x) is the property of being an ordinal, w is the set of all ordinals, and δ(y) is the least ordinal greater than every member of y. Priest spends the main part of his paper showing that th...
متن کاملOn the Principle of Uniform Solution: A Reply to Smith
All the standard paradoxes of self-reference, semantic and set-theoretic, satisfy the Inclosure Schema, and are therefore of a kind. The Principle of Uniform Solution (PUS) counsels: same kind of paradox, same kind of solution. Since standard solutions to the set-theoretic paradoxes do nothing to address the semantic paradoxes, and vice versa, this shows that each is inadequate. So I have argue...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003